ccs-author-response
Use when drafting an ACM CCS rebuttal during the HotCRP author-response window, covering threat-model defenses, adaptive-attack objections, ethics and disclosure questions, anonymity constraints, adversarial reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused replies aimed at the meta-reviewer.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-author-response --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# CCS Author Response Use this after CCS reviews are released. Reopen the current HotCRP rebuttal instructions and any length or format limits before drafting, because response mechanics are set per cycle. ## Triage - Answer concerns that affect the decision: threat-model soundness, novelty, correctness, evidence quality, ethics, and disclosure. Skip cosmetic complaints unless space allows. - Use
What does the ccs-author-response skill do?
Use when drafting an ACM CCS rebuttal during the HotCRP author-response window, covering threat-model defenses, adaptive-attack objections, ethics and disclosure questions, anonymity constraints, adversarial reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused replies aimed at the meta-reviewer.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-author-response --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.