Agent skill · Documentation

cc-writing-style

Use when polishing prose for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript — the Summary/Introduction/Results/Discussion craft, claim calibration, and Cell Press nomenclature/house style. It edits language and framing; it does not design experiments or build figures.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cc-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Cancer-Cell-Skills/skills/cc-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Writing Style & Claim Calibration (cc-writing-style) ## When to trigger - The Results read like a lab notebook rather than a mechanistic narrative - The Discussion overstates therapeutic / clinical impact - Claims outrun the evidence (single-system conclusions stated broadly) - Nomenclature, tense, or section structure are inconsistent with Cell Press ## Cell Press article structure (narrative roles) | Section | Role | |---------|------| | Summary | One-paragraph mechanistic arc (see `cc-structured-abstract`) | | Introduction | Concise; the gap and the hypothesis, not a textbook review | | Results | The mechanistic story, figure by figure, each claim tied to data | | Discussion | Interpretation, limitations, and **calibrated** translational implications | | STAR Methods | Structured methods + Key Resources Table (see `cc-reporting-standards`) | ## Results: write the mechanism as a story - Open each Results subsection with the **question/claim**, then the evidence, then the conclusion. - Each paragraph maps to a figure/panel; every assertion cites a panel. - Foreground **causality and orthogonal validation** ("loss of X reduced Y in cells and in PDX tumors") over a list of assays.

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Cell Press article structure (narrative roles)
  3. Results: write the mechanism as a story
  4. Claim calibration (the signature Cancer Cell discipline)
  5. Nomenclature & house style
  6. Worked micro-edit: a Results paragraph in Cancer Cell voice
  7. Discussion craft (where Cancer Cell papers over- or under-claim)
  8. Referee reflexes to preempt
  9. Checklist
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the cc-writing-style skill do?

Use when polishing prose for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript — the Summary/Introduction/Results/Discussion craft, claim calibration, and Cell Press nomenclature/house style. It edits language and framing; it does not design experiments or build figures.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cc-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going