Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

caveman-review

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

JuliusBrusseegithub.com/JuliusBrusseeGitHub ↗
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add JuliusBrussee/caveman --skill caveman-review --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/caveman-review/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 95,714 · +1,832 this week
Language: JavaScript
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

Write code review comments terse and actionable. One line per finding. Location, problem, fix. No throat-clearing. ## Rules **Format:** `L<line>: <problem>. <fix>.` — or `<file>:L<line>: ...` when reviewing multi-file diffs. **Severity prefix (optional, when mixed):** - `🔴 bug:` — broken behavior, will cause incident - `🟡 risk:` — works but fragile (race, missing null check, swallowed error) - `🔵 nit:` — style, naming, micro-optim. Author can ignore - `❓ q:` — genuine question, not a suggestion **Drop:** - "I noticed that...", "It seems like...", "You might want to consider..." - "This is just a suggestion but..." — use `nit:` instead - "Great work!", "Looks good overall but..." — say it once at the top, not per comment - Restating what the line does — the reviewer can read the diff - Hedging ("perhaps", "maybe", "I think") — if unsure use `q:` **Keep:** - Exact line numbers - Exact symbol/function/variable names in backticks - Concrete fix, not "consider refactoring this" - The *why* if the fix isn't obvious from the problem statement ## Examples ❌ "I noticed that on line 42 you're not checking if the user object is null before accessing the email property. This could potential

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Rules
  2. Examples
  3. Auto-Clarity
  4. Boundaries
Ships with 1 file
  • README.md
More from caveman
All skills →
About this skill
What does the caveman-review skill do?

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add JuliusBrussee/caveman --skill caveman-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From JuliusBrussee/caveman, a repository with 95,714 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going