Agent skill · Data & Analytics

car-rebuttal

Use when a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning the revision and drafting a point-by-point response to two reviewers and the subject Editor, including any new analyses, robustness, and updated Data Integrity/code-sharing materials. Drafts the response; it does not run the new estimation (car-data-analysis) or the final preflight (car-submission).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill car-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Contemporary-Accounting-Research-Skills/skills/car-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Rebuttal (car-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received a CAR revise-and-resubmit and must plan revisions and the response - Reviewers asked for new identification tests, experiments, or model robustness - The subject Editor's letter sets priorities you must address first - You need to reconcile the response with CAR's code-sharing and data-availability requirements ## Plan the revision before writing the letter - Build a **concordance**: every point from Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2, and the subject Editor, each mapped to a concrete action (new test, added robustness, reframing, clarification, or a reasoned push-back). - Let the **subject Editor's letter set priority** — it signals which concerns are decisive at CAR, where the subject Editor disposes and the **EIC approves all acceptances**. - Do the analytical/empirical work *first*; only then draft the response. **Invited revisions pay no further submission fee**, so the constraint is substance and the editor's deadline, not cost. ## Respond by tradition - **Archival.** Reviewers typically press on **identification and robustness** — new natural-experiment evidence, parallel-trends/placebo tests, alternative measures, addition

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Plan the revision before writing the letter
  3. Respond by tradition
  4. Write the point-by-point response
  5. Update CAR-specific materials
  6. Reproducibility change ledger
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the car-rebuttal skill do?

Use when a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning the revision and drafting a point-by-point response to two reviewers and the subject Editor, including any new analyses, robustness, and updated Data Integrity/code-sharing materials. Drafts the response; it does not run the new estimation (car-data-analysis) or the final preflight (car-submission).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill car-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going