Agent skill · Data & Analytics

car-methods

Use when the research design and identification are the bottleneck for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — choosing and defending an archival, experimental, analytical, field, or survey design and, for human-participant work, meeting CAR's mandatory ethics-approval verification. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (car-data-analysis).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill car-methods --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Contemporary-Accounting-Research-Skills/skills/car-methods/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Design & Methods (car-methods) ## When to trigger - The design may not deliver the inference the question needs (identification, internal validity, equilibrium logic) - An archival causal claim rests on an endogenous regressor with no strategy - An experiment's manipulation may not isolate the theorized construct - The study involves human participants and ethics-approval verification is unprepared - A reviewer says "the design cannot support this claim" ## Match the design to the question (CAR is method-agnostic) CAR welcomes any appropriate method; the bar is *fit and rigor*, not a preferred method. Pick the design that earns the claim: | Claim | Design that earns it | |----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------| | Capital-market/contracting effect of reporting | Panel archival with fixed effects + an identification strategy | | Causal effect of an information feature on judgment | Controlled experiment (lab/online/professional subjects) | | Existence/optimality of an equilibrium or contract | Analytical model: primitives, equilibrium concept, proofs | | Mechanism inside firms, audits, or stand

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Match the design to the question (CAR is method-agnostic)
  3. Design against the threats CAR reviewers probe
  4. CAR-specific design requirements
  5. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the car-methods skill do?

Use when the research design and identification are the bottleneck for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — choosing and defending an archival, experimental, analytical, field, or survey design and, for human-participant work, meeting CAR's mandatory ethics-approval verification. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (car-data-analysis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill car-methods --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going