Agent skill · Testing & QA

bjps-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) and which of its three formats to target. BJPS is a broad, internationally-oriented general journal, so the test is wide interest across subfields and beyond one national case, not subfield novelty alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Topic Selection & Fit (bjps-topic-selection) BJPS is a **broadly based, general-interest** political-science journal that "aims to cover developments across a wide range of countries and specialisms." The bar is not "new to my subfield" or "first study of country X" — it is **"of wide interest to political scientists."** Use this skill to pressure-test fit before you invest. ## When to trigger - Choosing among possible projects or framings for a BJPS submission - A reviewer/colleague said the paper feels "too narrow," "single-country," or "subfield-only" - Deciding between a **Research Article** and a **Letter** - Considering a **Comment** on a published BJPS piece ## The BJPS fit test A strong BJPS paper usually clears all four: 1. **Wide interest.** A scholar in a *different* subfield or studying a *different* region should see why it matters. Frame the stakes for politics broadly — institutions, behaviour, representation, conflict, political economy, normative order. 2. **A real contribution, not just a finding.** It changes how the field thinks, measures, or argues — a new mechanism, a decisive test, a reconceptualization, a corrected record. 3. **Credible on its own methodol

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The BJPS fit test
  3. Travel past your case and your subfield
  4. Format choice
  5. Anti-patterns
  6. Output format
  7. The two-axis fit screen (BJPS-specific)
  8. Calibration anchors (hedged)
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the bjps-topic-selection skill do?

Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) and which of its three formats to target. BJPS is a broad, internationally-oriented general journal, so the test is wide interest across subfields and beyond one national case, not subfield novelty alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going