Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

bjps-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution of wide, cross-subfield, international interest. BJPS readers span subfields and countries, so the paper must engage the literatures they expect and avoid the desk-screen trap of looking parochial. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: British-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/bjps-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (bjps-literature-positioning) BJPS is read across comparative politics, IR, theory, behaviour, political economy, and methods, and draws contributions from related disciplines (sociology, social psychology, economics, philosophy). Positioning is therefore not throat-clearing — it is how a non-specialist editor and reviewer see that the paper speaks to a **live, general** debate rather than a parochial one. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the introduction and the "contribution" paragraph - A reviewer said you "missed obvious work" or "don't engage the broader debate" - Your country/subfield literature is solid but the paper doesn't connect to general theory - You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest prior papers - Writing a **Comment** that must engage the target article precisely ## How BJPS wants the literature engaged 1. **Engage the debate, not a pile of citations.** Identify the live disagreement or open question the paper speaks to, and cite the works that *define* it — including across subfields and countries. 2. **Two audiences at once.** Satisfy specialists (you know the frontier) *and* generalists (why it matters). A sin

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How BJPS wants the literature engaged
  3. Cross-subfield / cross-national engagement (a distinctive BJPS demand)
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Output format
  6. Engagement depth BJPS editors expect, by paper type
  7. Calibration anchors (hedged)
  8. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the bjps-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution of wide, cross-subfield, international interest. BJPS readers span subfields and countries, so the paper must engage the literatures they expect and avoid the desk-screen trap of looking parochial. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill bjps-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going