aufenthaltstitel-pruefung

What it does

The skill instructs the agent to perform a comprehensive Prüfung of Aufenthaltstitel requests or refusals within the Fachanwalt Migrationsrecht framework. It directs the agent to identify the mandant's goal, mark deadlines and risks first, verify core legal norms, determine the responsible authority or court and relevant recipients, and collect documents and evidence. It emphasizes a step-by-step Prüfschema (15 steps) including identifying purpose, checking general eligibility criteria under § 5 AufenthG, verifying identity, assessing Ausweisungsinteresse, ensuring correct visa when entering, confirming language proofs, and evaluating frist-based fiktionswirkungen, housing and health insurance, and potential citizenship perspectives. It requires output in the form of an Aufenthaltstitel-Prüf-Memo with erteilungsvoraussetzungen-Checkliste and guidance on Klagewege. It also provides strategic options before templating and offers boilerplate Schrift­satzbausteine for common filings (e.g., Antrag auf Aufenthaltserlaubnis nach § 25b AufenthG; Widerspruch against denial of subsistence; Blaue Karte EU § 18b Abs. 2 AufenthG). It includes a Beweislast mapping, Fristen und Verjährung, Gegenargumente, Streitwert guidance, and a row of Einbürgerungsperspektive updates. The attached sections outline practical steps, source norms, and example language to draft filings and responses.

The skill is triggered for mandant questions about which Aufenthaltstitel fits or after a dismissal by the foreign authorities and aims to deliver a structured, legally anchored memo with a risk and deadline visualization, plus actionable steps.

How it works

• Clarify roles, target output, deadlines, and required deliverable upfront.
• Mark deadlines and immediate risks using field-specific categories (Widerspruch, Klage, Einspruch, Rechtsmittel, Verjährung, Verwirkung, Rüge-, Anzeige-, Anmelde- und Ausschlussfristen).
• Verify the legal framework by listing and cross-checking the listed Normen (e.g., AufenthG §§ 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 16a-16g, 18a-18g, 19c, 25, 27-36, 50, 53-55, 58, 60, 60a-60d, 81, 84, 95; AsylG §§ 13, 24-30, 34-38, 71, 74, 77; FreizügG/EU §§ 2-5; StAG §§ 4, 5, 8-10, 12a, 25, 30; AsylbLG §§ 1, 3, 6; VwGO §§ 74, 80, 123; Dublin-III-VO Art. 3, 17, 21-29).
• Determine the Zuständige Stelle und die Adressaten (Mandant, Gegner, Behörde oder Gericht, Sachverständige, ggf. EU-/internationale Stelle).
• Gather documents and evidence across categories (Verwaltungsakte, Verträge, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, Protokolle, Gutachten, externe Beweismittel). Where gaps exist, obtain missing items via Akteneinsicht or mandant inquiries. Implement Live-Check for day-to-day norm changes.
• Execute the Prüfschema (15 steps) to identify purpose, check § 5 AufenthG requirements, verify identity, assess Ausweisungsinteresse, confirm visa status, ensure language proofs, review fiktionswirkung, housing and health insurance, Einbürgerung prospects, and compile an Unterlagen-Liste.
• Produce output as an Aufenthaltstitel-Prüfung Memo with a checklist of Erteilungsvoraussetzungen and Klagewege.
• Offer pre-template strategic options and provide Schrift­satzbausteine for common filings.
• Provide Beweislast, Fristen/Verjährung, Gegenargumente, Kosten/ Streitwert, and Strategieempfehlungen.

When to use it

• When a mandant asks which Aufenthaltstitel fits him or when there is a denial from the Ausländerbehörde.
• When constructing a formal Prüfung and memo that includes deadlines, risk assessment, and stepwise actions, prior to filing or responding to authorities.

What it can touch

• Tools: claude-code
• It references templates and boilerplate language for filings and memos, including: "Aufenthaltstitel-Prüfung Memo", "Erteilungsvoraussetzungen-Checkliste" and various Schrift­satzbausteine.

Caveats

• The skill relies on statutory sections and does not omit explicit Norm references listed in the material. It does not guarantee outcomes; it prescribes steps and evidence collection, not the results of filings.
• It emphasizes avoiding cross-domain cita­tions and insists on day-to-day norm changes via Live-Check.