asq-review-process
Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types, reviewer/editor roles, and what each stage expects. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (see asq-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asq-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process Navigation (asq-review-process) ## When to trigger - You are about to submit and want to set expectations for the review - A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it before responding - You are unsure how ASQ's developmental review differs from a desk-reject-heavy journal - You need to decide whether an invitation to revise is worth pursuing ## How ASQ review works (durable norms) ASQ is known for a **developmental, craft-focused, double-blind** review process. Editors and reviewers typically engage deeply with the *idea* and aim to help promising papers become their best version. The editorship passed from **Christine Beckman and András Tilcsik** to **Beth Bechky** (UC Davis; term began July 1, 2025), and recent editorial communications have foregrounded **curation** — shaping a smaller set of enduring papers rather than maximizing throughput. The three questions editors say they ask of any manuscript: does it (1) advance understanding of organizing (teams, enterprises, markets), (2) develop a new theoretical account or findings that challenge prior understanding, and (3) address a significant, challenging problem of management? Expect: - **No submissi
- When to trigger
- How ASQ review works (durable norms)
- Decision types (typical)
- Reading the decision letter
- What each round expects
- Deciding whether to revise
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the asq-review-process skill do?
Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types, reviewer/editor roles, and what each stage expects. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (see asq-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asq-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.