Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and footnotes.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ASPLOS Writing Style Two 2027 mechanics dictate ASPLOS prose (CFP, checked 2026-07-08): the rapid review reads **only the first two pages**, and the 11-page limit counts **all text, figures, tables, and footnotes** — references excluded. The first makes pages 1-2 a survival organ; the second makes every figure a budget decision. Style here is mostly resource allocation. ## Engineering pages 1-2 as a standalone document By the bottom of page 2, a screener must hold four things. Audit for them mechanically, in order: | Element | Test | Common failure | |---|---|---| | Cross-layer problem | Can a reader from any of the three communities restate it? | A single-community problem with "co-design" sprinkled on | | One-sentence insight | Is there a sentence a screener could quote in their note? | Insight diffused across three paragraphs, or a category ("we co-design X and Y") instead of an idea | | Mechanism sketch | Does the reader know what each layer *does*? | Architecture described, software hand-waved (or vice versa) | | Headline evidence | Result + platform class (silicon/FPGA/simulator) + baseline named? | "Significant improvements on a variety of workloads" | Corollary: backgroun

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Engineering pages 1-2 as a standalone document
  2. The insight sentence
  3. Structuring the mechanism across layers
  4. Claim calibration, systems dialect
  5. The 11-page budget with figures inside it
  6. House-rule details that mark a native submission
  7. A load-order for the abstract
  8. Section skeleton that serves three readerships
  9. Revision-aware prose
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the asplos-writing-style skill do?

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and footnotes.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill asplos-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going