Agent skill · Data & Analytics

ase-reproducibility

Use when building the open-science and reproducibility story for an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) submission, covering the mandatory Data Availability Statement, anonymized-but-runnable tools, tool and subject-system provenance pinning, cached LLM outputs, and staging for the ACM Available/Reusable artifact badges.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ASE-Skills/skills/ase-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ASE Reproducibility Build the reproducibility story at data-collection time, not at submission. ASE requires a **mandatory Data Availability Statement** in the paper and expects an **anonymized, runnable** artifact at review time; automated-SE artifacts are usually *tools*, so "runnable" means a reviewer can actually execute the automation on stated subjects. What is not pinned when you collect it cannot be reconstructed later. ## The mandatory Data Availability Statement - **Required**, placed **after the Conclusions** and **inside the 10-page limit** (it is not free appendix space). - State what exists — the tool, the dataset, the subject systems, the scripts, the logs — and **where it will live** after acceptance (an archival DOI target). - Provide an **anonymized** link or upload now; "available upon request" reads as a scored weakness, not a neutral placeholder. - Match the statement to what the archive actually contains — an overclaiming statement is worse than a modest, honest one. ## Anonymized-but-runnable tools - Re-host the tool and dataset behind an **anonymizing service**; strip repository owner, commit author metadata, and any path revealing your identity (`/home/<y

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The mandatory Data Availability Statement
  2. Anonymized-but-runnable tools
  3. Provenance pinning (do this at collection time)
  4. Reproducibility failure modes (ASE-specific)
  5. From submission to the ACM badges
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ase-reproducibility skill do?

Use when building the open-science and reproducibility story for an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) submission, covering the mandatory Data Availability Statement, anonymized-but-runnable tools, tool and subject-system provenance pinning, cached LLM outputs, and staging for the ACM Available/Reusable artifact badges.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ase-reproducibility --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going