Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

arpsych-writing-style

Use when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership. Shapes voice, abstract, and intro; it does not design the spine (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run final checks (arpsych-submission).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Writing Style — The ARPsych Voice (arpsych-writing-style) ## When to trigger - The framework, balance, and exhibits are settled; it is time to write (or rewrite) prose - A draft is technically correct but reads like a grant report or a primary-paper method section - The abstract and introduction need to be written (do these *last*) - A non-specialist test reader gets lost in jargon or cannot find the argument ## What the ARPsych voice is ARPsych reviews are read across all of psychology and by adjacent fields. The register is **authoritative but accessible**: written by a leading expert, readable by a smart psychologist outside the subfield, and usable in a graduate seminar. The two failure poles are (1) a dense specialist treatise only insiders can parse, and (2) a chatty overview with no analytical edge. Aim between them: deep but legible. | Principle | In practice | |-----------|-------------| | **Argument forward** | Every section advances the spine; the reader always knows where they are in the framework | | **Define on first use** | Spell out constructs, paradigms, and acronyms for the adjacent reader | | **Show the mechanism** | Explain *why* an effect occurs, not just tha

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. What the ARPsych voice is
  3. Write the abstract and introduction LAST
  4. The future-directions close (do not skip it)
  5. One voice for multi-author reviews
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the arpsych-writing-style skill do?

Use when drafting or polishing prose for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so it lands the authoritative-yet-accessible house voice for a broad psychology readership. Shapes voice, abstract, and intro; it does not design the spine (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run final checks (arpsych-submission).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going