Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

arpsych-tables-figures

Use when designing the summary tables and conceptual figures for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review — the who-found-what tables and the one framework diagram that carries the spine. Designs exhibits; it does not design the spine itself (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run a meta-analysis (arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-tables-figures --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Tables & Figures — Exhibits That Carry the Spine (arpsych-tables-figures) ## When to trigger - The framework is set and you need exhibits that *show* it, not decorate the text - A who-found-what summary table would save pages of prose - The review needs one figure a reader can screenshot and remember - A meta-analytic result needs a forest plot or effect-summary display ## Exhibits in a review do different work than in a primary paper A primary paper's figures *report results*; a review's exhibits **organize a literature**. ARPsych readers and teachers reproduce the good ones in slides for years. Two exhibit types carry most of the load: ### 1. The conceptual framework figure (the signature exhibit) One diagram that **makes the spine visible** — the taxonomy, the process model, the levels-of-analysis stack, the theory contest. It is the review's logo. Tests: - A reader who sees only this figure grasps the review's argument about the field. - Every box/arrow maps to a section; nothing in the figure is unexplained in text and vice versa. - It is self-contained — caption defines all terms; no jargon a non-specialist can't parse. - It is *generative*: empty regions read as open quest

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Exhibits in a review do different work than in a primary paper
  3. 1. The conceptual framework figure (the signature exhibit)
  4. 2. The synthesis table (who found what)
  5. Production constraints (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the arpsych-tables-figures skill do?

Use when designing the summary tables and conceptual figures for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review — the who-found-what tables and the one framework diagram that carries the spine. Designs exhibits; it does not design the spine itself (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run a meta-analysis (arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-tables-figures --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going