Agent skill · Testing & QA

arpsych-literature-synthesis

Use when systematically gathering, reading, and structuring the literature for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so coverage is comprehensive and current. Builds the evidence base; it does not design the analytical spine (arpsych-organizing-framework) or judge balance (arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-literature-synthesis --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-literature-synthesis/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Synthesis — Reading the Whole Field (arpsych-literature-synthesis) ## When to trigger - An invitation is in hand and the reading must start in earnest - The user has "read a lot" but has no system for tracking what is covered - Coverage gaps are likely (one paradigm, one lab, or one decade dominates the notes) - An embedded meta-analysis is planned and the search must be documentable ## Coverage is the price of admission, not the contribution ARPsych readers trust a review to be **comprehensive within its frame and current to the frontier**. A reviewer caught missing a major line of work loses authority instantly. But coverage is the floor: the *contribution* is the framework you impose later (`arpsych-organizing-framework`). This skill builds an evidence base broad and well-recorded enough that (a) nothing important is missed and (b) you can later be *selective in prose* without being *incomplete in coverage*. ## A systematic, documentable search Even a narrative review benefits from a near-systematic search you can describe: 1. **Seed set** — the canonical and recent agenda-setting papers you already know. 2. **Forward + backward citation chasing** — who cites the se

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Coverage is the price of admission, not the contribution
  3. A systematic, documentable search
  4. The evidence matrix (one row per study/finding)
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the arpsych-literature-synthesis skill do?

Use when systematically gathering, reading, and structuring the literature for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review so coverage is comprehensive and current. Builds the evidence base; it does not design the analytical spine (arpsych-organizing-framework) or judge balance (arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-literature-synthesis --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going