Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

arecon-tables-figures

Use when building exhibits for an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review — summary "who-found-what" tables, the conceptual/framework figure, and meta-evidence exhibits that synthesize across studies. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an ARE review reports no new estimates of its own).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-tables-figures --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-tables-figures/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Tables & Figures for a Review (arecon-tables-figures) ## When to trigger - The synthesis is done and an adjacent-field reader needs to *see* the field at a glance - A controversy or a body of estimates would be clearer as a table than as prose - The organizing framework would land better as a diagram - You are tempted to paste a regression table — but this is a review, not a primary paper ## The three exhibit types an ARE review actually uses ARE exhibits **summarize across the literature**; they do not present the author's own estimation. The workhorses: | Exhibit | Purpose | Design notes | |---------|---------|--------------| | **Who-found-what summary table** | one row per study (or per design class): question/estimand, method, sample, finding (direction + magnitude), credibility note | rows ordered by the framework's cells, not chronology; columns let the reader compare *comparable* objects | | **Conceptual / framework figure** | render the organizing spine — taxonomy tree, mechanism diagram, the simple unifying model | this is often the review's signature exhibit; it should be restate-able from memory by a non-specialist | | **Meta-evidence exhibit** | a forest-style plot, a

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The three exhibit types an ARE review actually uses
  3. Building a credible summary table
  4. The conceptual figure is ARE's signature
  5. Meta-analysis caution
  6. Reproduced vs. re-drawn figures
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the arecon-tables-figures skill do?

Use when building exhibits for an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review — summary "who-found-what" tables, the conceptual/framework figure, and meta-evidence exhibits that synthesize across studies. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an ARE review reports no new estimates of its own).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-tables-figures --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going