arecon-revision
Use when responding to Editorial Committee and referee feedback on an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review — coverage gaps, balance/accuracy complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (arecon-organizing-framework).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-revision --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Revision & Response for a Review (arecon-revision) ## When to trigger - A Committee/referee letter on the invited review arrived - Referees flagged missing literatures, imbalance, mischaracterization, or "reads like a list" - The editor asked to expand, cut, or rebalance coverage, or to make the framework explicit - You need a point-by-point response for a review article, not a primary paper ## Categories of review feedback (and how to answer each) ARE revision asks cluster differently from primary-research asks. Triage every point into one bucket: | Feedback type | Typical phrasing | Response move | |---------------|------------------|---------------| | **Coverage gap** | "you omit the X literature / author Y" | almost always *concede and integrate* — place the missing work in the right framework cell; re-run saturation (`arecon-literature-synthesis`) | | **Balance / fairness** | "this slights school Z / over-cites the author" | steelman the slighted side; re-audit self-citation (`arecon-evidence-standards`) | | **Appraisal accuracy** | "you mischaracterize study W" | correct precisely; reviewed authors often referee — fix exactly | | **Framework / structure** | "this is an anno
- When to trigger
- Categories of review feedback (and how to answer each)
- AREcon-specific revision ledger
- Writing the response letter
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the arecon-revision skill do?
Use when responding to Editorial Committee and referee feedback on an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review — coverage gaps, balance/accuracy complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (arecon-organizing-framework).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-revision --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.