arecon-review-process
Use when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the accuracy/rigor/balance bar, and the annual-volume timeline. Sets expectations; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or draft the response letter (arecon-revision).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process — What to Expect (arecon-review-process) ## When to trigger - The commissioned draft is delivered and you want to know what happens next - You are unsure whether an invited review is auto-accepted (it is not) and what it is judged on - You need to plan around the annual-volume production schedule - A coauthor expects journal-style turnaround and you must reset that to the Committee cadence ## How an invited ARE review is evaluated Being invited gets your draft *reviewed*, not *accepted*. After delivery, the Editorial Committee assesses the manuscript for **accuracy, rigor, and balance**, and may route it to **another Committee member or an external expert** as appropriate (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). The bar is the review-article bar, not the primary-research bar: | Stage | What happens | What it tests | |-------|-------------|---------------| | Commissioning | Committee invites the topic/author; scope is set | fit, author standing, ARE-shaped topic | | Delivery | author submits the invited draft in the commissioned workflow | completeness, format, declarations | | Committee/expert review | a Committee member and/or external referee read it | accuracy, rigor, balance, acce
- When to trigger
- How an invited ARE review is evaluated
- Timeline reality
- What referees push on (and how to pre-empt)
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the arecon-review-process skill do?
Use when calibrating expectations for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee review cycle on an invited article — what happens after delivery, who reviews, the accuracy/rigor/balance bar, and the annual-volume timeline. Sets expectations; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or draft the response letter (arecon-revision).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.