Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

aos-review-process

Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-review-process/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Review Process (aos-review-process) ## When to trigger - Calibrating expectations before or just after submitting to AOS - A decision letter arrived and its signals need decoding - You want to anticipate the reviewer mix an interdisciplinary journal will assemble - You are deciding whether a rejected paper should be reworked for AOS or rerouted ## How AOS handles a submission - **Triage by the joint EiCs.** Three Editors-in-Chief share the desk (verified 2026-07-16: Marcia Annisette, Martin Messner, Hun-Tong Tan), with profiles spanning the journal's traditions — critical/interpretive, management accounting/qualitative, and experimental/JDM. Your paper will be read first by an editor fluent in its tradition; scope misfits are desk-rejected quickly, and the capital-markets-without-theory genre is the most frequent casualty. - **Double-anonymized refereeing.** Reviewers are chosen for the paper's tradition *and* its theory: a field study using institutional theory may draw one accounting-field-study specialist and one reader closer to organization theory; an experiment draws JDM expertise. Expect referees who know the imported theory's primary sources. - **Decision types.** Desk re

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How AOS handles a submission
  3. What each referee archetype presses on
  4. Reading the decision letter
  5. If the decision is negative
  6. Before you submit: the two-referee dry run
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the aos-review-process skill do?

Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going