Agent skill · Data & Analytics

aos-methods

Use when designing the study for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — qualitative field studies (access, case logic, interviews, observation), behavioral experiments, surveys, historical/archival inquiry, or theory-laden archival designs, each with the ethics and site-anonymity groundwork done early. Designs the inquiry; it does not run the coding or estimation (aos-data-analysis).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-methods --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Accounting-Organizations-and-Society-Skills/skills/aos-methods/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Design & Methods (aos-methods) ## When to trigger - Choosing between field study, experiment, survey, or historical design for a settled question - Negotiating field access, case selection, or interview/observation protocols - Designing manipulations and participant pools for a behavioral experiment - Ethics approval, informed consent, or site-anonymity commitments are still open - A reviewer says the design cannot support the paper's interpretive or causal claims ## Methodological pluralism, single standard AOS accepts any method suited to studying accounting's social operation, and holds each to the rigor bar of its own tradition. The design must let the *theoretical lens* meet the *empirical material* on fair terms — enough depth for interpretation, enough control for causal process claims, enough sources for historical reconstruction. ## Qualitative field study (the modal AOS design) - **Case logic.** Justify the site theoretically: extreme, revelatory, or transparently typical for the phenomenon. "We had access" is a fact, not a rationale — convert access into an argument about what this site lets you see. - **Data plan.** Triangulate interviews, observation, and in

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Methodological pluralism, single standard
  3. Qualitative field study (the modal AOS design)
  4. Behavioral experiment
  5. Survey and historical designs
  6. Ethics and anonymity (settle before collection)
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the aos-methods skill do?

Use when designing the study for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — qualitative field studies (access, case logic, interviews, observation), behavioral experiments, surveys, historical/archival inquiry, or theory-laden archival designs, each with the ethics and site-anonymity groundwork done early. Designs the inquiry; it does not run the coding or estimation (aos-data-analysis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aos-methods --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going