anmath-figures
Use when organizing the exposition and structure of a pure-mathematics manuscript for Annals of Mathematics — sectioning, notation, statements-before-proofs, commutative diagrams, and readability for an expert non-specialist. Figures are optional and rare; this skill is about exposition first. Does not assess the proof's correctness.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill anmath-figures --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Exposition and Structure (anmath-figures) ## When to trigger - The paper is hard to follow even though the proof is correct - Notation is inconsistent or introduced after first use - Theorems and their proofs are interleaved confusingly - A relation between objects would be far clearer as a commutative diagram - You are deciding whether the rare case of an actual figure is warranted > In pure ma
What does the anmath-figures skill do?
Use when organizing the exposition and structure of a pure-mathematics manuscript for Annals of Mathematics — sectioning, notation, statements-before-proofs, commutative diagrams, and readability for an expert non-specialist. Figures are optional and rare; this skill is about exposition first. Does not assess the proof's correctness.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill anmath-figures --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.