Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

amj-rebuttal

Use when drafting the revision and response letter after an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across a multi-round developmental process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (amj-review-process).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amj-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Response & Rebuttal (amj-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received an AMJ R&R and have planned the revision (via `amj-review-process`) - You have actually made (or scoped) the manuscript changes and need to write the response document - You must reconcile conflicting reviewer demands for the action editor - A later-round decision asks you to defend or further revise prior changes > Write the response letter **after** revising the manuscript, not before. The letter documents changes you have made, not promises. AMJ's process is developmental and typically multi-round; resubmit the revised manuscript and response document through ScholarOne (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/AMJ), keeping the same action editor across rounds where possible, and remember the revised main body still must respect the **40-page limit** (text + references + appendices). ## Response-document structure 1. **Opening letter to the action editor.** Thank the editor and reviewers; summarize the most important changes in 2–4 sentences; explicitly state how you addressed the editor's stated priorities. Note where reviewers conflicted and how you resolved it. 2. **Per-reviewer sections.** For each reviewer, restate

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Response-document structure
  3. How to respond to AMJ's signature demands
  4. Tone and tactics
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the amj-rebuttal skill do?

Use when drafting the revision and response letter after an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across a multi-round developmental process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (amj-review-process).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amj-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going