Agent skill · Data & Analytics

amj-methods

Use when the research design and method are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — matching design (archival, survey, experiment, multi-method, field) and level of analysis to the theoretical question. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or validity checks (amj-data-analysis).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amj-methods --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-methods/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Design & Methods (amj-methods) ## When to trigger - The design may not match the theory's level, timing, or causal claim - Data are single-source, single-wave, and self-reported (common-method bias risk) - The theory is causal but the design is cross-sectional/correlational - Constructs lack established, validated measures - A reviewer says "the design cannot test this hypothesis" or "endogeneity is unaddressed" ## Match the design to the question AMJ explicitly welcomes **all empirical methods** — qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, meta-analytic, and mixed. The bar is *fit and rigor*, not a single preferred method, and qualitative designs are held to an equally demanding standard (the Eisenhardt multiple-case approach and the Gioia methodology for grounded qualitative rigor are the field's reference points). | Theoretical claim | Design that earns it | |--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| | Causal effect of a manipulable cause | Experiment (lab/field/online), or natural experiment | | Process unfolding over time | Multi-wave panel; longitudinal/lagged design | | Firm/strategy outcomes from a

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Match the design to the question
  3. Designing against the threats AMJ cares about
  4. Level-of-analysis discipline
  5. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the amj-methods skill do?

Use when the research design and method are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — matching design (archival, survey, experiment, multi-method, field) and level of analysis to the theoretical question. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or validity checks (amj-data-analysis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amj-methods --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going