amann-review-process
Use when planning around the two-step proposal→invited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines. Explains the process; it does not write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# The Annals Review Process (amann-review-process) ## When to trigger - You are deciding whether to start now or wait for the next deadline - You need to understand who reviews what, when, and how blinding changes between stages - You are planning a realistic timeline from proposal to published review - A coauthor assumes Annals works like a normal journal (it does not) ## The two-step process is the defining feature Annals does not accept full reviews cold. Intake is a **gated, two-step process** (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准): | Stage | What happens | Blinding & reviewers | Output | |-------|--------------|----------------------|--------| | **1. Proposal** | Submit a ≤5-page proposal (four headings) at a deadline | **Double-blind**, reviewed by the **Associate Editors** | Invitation to develop the full review, or decline | | **2. Invited full review** | Develop the ~50-page review with editorial guidance | **Forgoes double-blind**; read by the **Associate Editor and Editor** | Conditional acceptance / revisions / decline | The consequences are large: most of the *gatekeeping* happens at the lightweight proposal stage, and most of the *development* happens collaboratively with an editor who
- When to trigger
- The two-step process is the defining feature
- The cadence
- Planning the timeline
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the amann-review-process skill do?
Use when planning around the two-step proposal→invited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines. Explains the process; it does not write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.