Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

aerj-literature-positioning

Use when positioning an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript in the literature. AERJ readers span the whole field, so the paper must engage the literatures a general education-research audience expects and speak past its own subfield. Builds the positioning argument; it does not write the literature review for you.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aerj-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: American-Educational-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/aerj-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (aerj-literature-positioning) An AERJ paper must locate itself in the **field-wide** conversation, not just a niche citation cluster. The literature review establishes the gap, the stakes, and why this study advances understanding for a general education-research reader. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the literature/background section - A reviewer said the paper "doesn't engage the relevant literature" or "talks only to insiders" - Establishing the gap the study fills and why it matters broadly - Reconciling literatures across subfields or methods ## How to position 1. **Map the conversation, not a pile of citations.** Organize by debate or construct, not by author. Show the reader the shape of what is known and where it disagrees. 2. **Engage what AERJ readers expect.** Cite the field-defining and lens-relevant work (policy / organizational / equity literatures; learning / teaching / development literatures), plus the methodological literature your design rests on. 3. **Name the gap precisely.** Not "little is known" — specify the unanswered question, the unresolved tension, or the untested mechanism your study addresses. 4. **Cross subfields de

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How to position
  3. The "so what for the field" test
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. What AERJ reviewers expect a review to engage
  6. Worked positioning vignette (illustrative)
  7. Referee pushback and the venue-specific fix
  8. Output format
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the aerj-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript in the literature. AERJ readers span the whole field, so the paper must engage the literatures a general education-research audience expects and speak past its own subfield. Builds the positioning argument; it does not write the literature review for you.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aerj-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going