Agent skill · Design & Presentation

aejpol-literature-positioning

Use when placing the contribution against the policy-evaluation literature and sharpening it as a policy answer for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Stakes the contribution and the policy-relevant "so what"; it does not write the full introduction or design the identification.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejpol-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: AEJ-Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/aejpol-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning & Contribution Framing (aejpol-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The contribution vs. existing policy evaluations is fuzzy, or sounds like "we add another estimate" - A referee asks "what do we learn beyond [prior study of this or a similar policy]?" - The literature review is a list of citations rather than a map of the open policy question - You need to frame the contribution so the **policy lesson**, not the method, is the news ## How AEJ: Policy contributions are staked At AEJ: Policy the contribution is a **better answer to a policy question**, not a new estimate for its own sake. Position the paper on three axes and make the policy reading the headline: 1. **The policy-design gap.** What does a policymaker still not know — the sign, the magnitude, the cost-effectiveness, the incidence, the optimal level, or the external validity of an existing estimate? State the gap as something a decision-maker would care about. 2. **The credibility upgrade.** If prior evidence exists, say why yours is more credible (cleaner design, better data, a policy variation that breaks a confound, a setting that fixes external-validity worries) — but only as a mean

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How AEJ: Policy contributions are staked
  3. Positioning patterns that land
  4. Citation discipline (AEA house)
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Referee pushback mapped to the fix
  8. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  9. How the three contribution bullets read in the intro
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the aejpol-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when placing the contribution against the policy-evaluation literature and sharpening it as a policy answer for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Stakes the contribution and the policy-relevant "so what"; it does not write the full introduction or design the identification.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejpol-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going