acmmm-author-response
Use when drafting the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) rebuttal — turning multiple anonymous reviews into one focused, anonymous response that fixes factual errors first, adds small confirmatory cross-modal results, concedes calibratedly, and stays inside policy (anonymous, no new external links), written for the area chair who decides.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill acmmm-author-response --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# ACM MM Author Response Use this to write the ACM Multimedia rebuttal. It is **optional and anonymous**, it must not add new external links, and its real audience is the **area chair** who will weigh it against the reviews in discussion. ## Triage before writing Sort every review point into one of three buckets: | Bucket | Example | Response | |---|---|---| | Factual error | "No ablation of the fusion" (there is one, in §4.3) | Point to it precisely; this is your strongest move | | Fixable gap | "Missing a late-fusion baseline" | Add the small result if you can run it in time | | Judgment call | "The delta is incremental" | Reframe the significance briefly, or concede narrowly | Lead with the factual corrections — they are the points an AC can verify and act on fastest. ## Structure for the AC Write for a reader who is skimming several rebuttals. Make it navigable: ```text [R1, R2 shared concern: fusion not shown to matter] -> Table A (new): leave-one-modality-out; audio-text term = +X of the +Y total gain. [R1 factual: "no user study"] -> §5 reports a user study, N raters, agreement kappa; see supplement S3. [R3 judgment: "incremental over late fusion"] -> Our gain over the late-
- Triage before writing
- Structure for the AC
- Small confirmatory results
- Calibrated concessions
- Policy guardrails
- Length and format discipline
- Rebuttal skeleton by review type
- Tone
- Output format
What does the acmmm-author-response skill do?
Use when drafting the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) rebuttal — turning multiple anonymous reviews into one focused, anonymous response that fixes factual errors first, adds small confirmatory cross-modal results, concedes calibratedly, and stays inside policy (anonymous, no new external links), written for the area chair who decides.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill acmmm-author-response --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.