Agent skill · Data & Analytics

acl-supplementary

Use when organizing appendices and supplementary material for an ACL paper under ACL Rolling Review, covering the mandatory Limitations and optional ethics sections, appendices after references, anonymized software and data archives, the no-cloud-links rule, and deciding what must stay in the 8-page or 4-page body.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill acl-supplementary --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ACL-Skills/skills/acl-supplementary/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ACL Supplementary Use this when splitting an ACL paper between body, appendix, and archive. The governing ARR principle: **reviewers are not required to consider material in appendices or supplements**, so anything decision-critical that lives only there is effectively invisible. ## The ACL page anatomy ```text [ content pages: 8 long / 4 short ] <- the reviewed argument lives here [ Limitations (REQUIRED, unlimited) ] <- after conclusion, outside page count [ Ethics statement (optional) ] [ References (unlimited) ] [ Appendices (unlimited, same PDF) ] <- optional reading for reviewers + separate .tgz/.zip archive <- software / data supplement ``` Missing Limitations is a desk-reject condition; treating it as one throwaway sentence is a review-stage penalty even when it passes the gate. ## What must not leave the body - The main results table and the headline comparison. - Task definition and enough of the method that a reviewer can judge novelty. - At least a summary of the error analysis — a pointer-only error analysis reads as not having one. - Human-evaluation design in one paragraph: raters, items, agreement. - The experimental setup at reproduction-outline level; full grids

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The ACL page anatomy
  2. What must not leave the body
  3. What appendices are good at
  4. Limitations section that actually works
  5. Archive rules and hygiene
  6. Body-vs-appendix vignette
  7. Appendix ordering convention that reviewers navigate well
  8. Ethics statement: when to write one
  9. Size and dependency guardrails
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the acl-supplementary skill do?

Use when organizing appendices and supplementary material for an ACL paper under ACL Rolling Review, covering the mandatory Limitations and optional ethics sections, appendices after references, anonymized software and data archives, the no-cloud-links rule, and deciding what must stay in the 8-page or 4-page body.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill acl-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going