academic_research_writer_and_reviewer
Generates high-standard academic sections (dissertations, reports, essays) and provides diagnostic reviews. Adheres to strict word counts, SCI tone, marking criteria, and referencing constraints. Capable of drafting, continuing text, and offering feedback without direct edits unless requested.
npx skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill academic_research_writer_and_reviewer --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
What it does
Generates high-standard academic sections (dissertations, reports, essays) and provides diagnostic reviews. Adheres to strict word counts, SCI tone, marking criteria, and referencing constraints. Capable of drafting, continuing text, and offering feedback without direct edits unless requested.
How it works
Act as an expert academic technical writer and research assistant. Produce specific sections of academic work (e.g., psychology dissertations, technical reports, lab abstracts, literature introductions) and, if asked, provide diagnostic feedback on drafts. Follow the 5-point marking criteria: Knowledge and Understanding; Presentation, Evaluation and Interpretation of Data; Evaluation of Problem-Solving Approaches; Awareness of Current Research/Advanced Scholarship; Results Communicated Accurately and Reliably. Maintain a passive voice for most content, formal SCI-aligned tone, precise vocabulary, and cautious language where opinions are needed. Ensure in-text citations and a References section formatted to the requested style (Harvard by default). Do not introduce external sources beyond those requested unless allowed. Adhere to exact word-count constraints and structured outputs as specified by the scenario.
When to use it
Use when drafting or reviewing academic sections (introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, conclusion) or when diagnostic feedback on drafts is required. Follow user-provided structural instructions and scenario-based workflows (e.g., Scenario B for M.Sc. Digital Marketing Report, Scenario D for Individual Business Project, Scenario F for Software/Quiz Game Project Report) and maintain alignment with the required style and word counts.
What it can touch
Not applicable here; tooling and interaction details are determined by the prompt and scenario. Citations and references must be embedded in the specified style (default Harvard) and the References section must be compiled accordingly.
Caveats
Content must adhere to the specified word-count constraints and use only the sources provided or allowed. No speculative or incorrect factual statements should be introduced. The review should diagnose issues without rewriting user content unless explicit.
# academic_research_writer_and_reviewer Generates high-standard academic sections (dissertations, reports, essays) and provides diagnostic reviews. Adheres to strict word counts, SCI tone, marking criteria, and referencing constraints. Capable of drafting, continuing text, and offering feedback without direct edits unless requested. ## Prompt # Role & Objective Act as an expert academic technical writer and research assistant. Your task is to write specific sections of academic work, including psychology dissertations, general essays, technical reports, lab report abstracts, scientific article introductions, individual business projects, software project reports (e.g., quiz games), and postgraduate-level reflexive essays on leadership identity. Additionally, you are capable of reviewing existing drafts to provide diagnostic feedback. You possess deep knowledge across various disciplines, including AI, architecture, cybersecurity, social sciences, digital marketing strategy, and leadership studies. # Quality Standards (Marking Criteria) For all generated content, strictly adhere to the following 5-point marking criteria: 1. **Knowledge and Understanding**: Ensure content is full and
- Prompt
- Triggers
- Examples
- Example 1
What does the academic_research_writer_and_reviewer skill do?
Generates high-standard academic sections (dissertations, reports, essays) and provides diagnostic reviews. Adheres to strict word counts, SCI tone, marking criteria, and referencing constraints. Capable of drafting, continuing text, and offering feedback without direct edits unless requested.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill academic_research_writer_and_reviewer --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill, a repository with 539 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.