Agent skill · Design & Presentation

aaag-research-design

Use when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and physical-environmental methods, qualitative human-geography inference, or nature-society mixed methods. The Annals judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-research-design --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-research-design/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Design (aaag-research-design) The Annals spans four areas and accepts many methodologies, but is demanding about each. The design must credibly connect the geographic argument (`aaag-theory-building`) to the evidence, and must take **space and scale seriously** — spatial dependence, the MAUP, projection, and sampling are design issues, not afterthoughts. This skill is mode-aware: pick the section that matches your work. ## When to trigger - Specifying identification, sampling, case selection, or measurement - A reviewer questioned spatial autocorrelation, scale/MAUP, edge effects, validation, or a confound - Justifying why the design adjudicates the rival account from `aaag-literature-positioning` ## Spatial / quantitative analysis & GIScience - **Take space seriously.** Test and model **spatial dependence** (Moran's I, spatial lag/error, GWR/MGWR where heterogeneity is the point); state how the **MAUP / scale** could change conclusions. - **Geography of the data.** Document projection/CRS, areal units, edge effects, and the support of measurements; spatial sampling and its biases. - **Inference.** Cluster or use spatial SEs at the right level; for spatial autocorrelatio

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Spatial / quantitative analysis & GIScience
  3. Remote sensing / physical-environmental
  4. Qualitative / human-geography
  5. Nature-society / mixed methods
  6. The adjudication test (Annals-specific)
  7. Referee pushback → Annals-specific fix
  8. Calibration anchors
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Output format
  11. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the aaag-research-design skill do?

Use when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and physical-environmental methods, qualitative human-geography inference, or nature-society mixed methods. The Annals judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-research-design --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going