Optim-Agent/

optim-plans

GitHub

Human-in-the-loop planning plugin for Claude and Codex: turn ideas into reviewed Markdown plans, record decisions, enforce explicit execution gates, and provide tested controller primitives for safer agent workflows.

288stars

1forks

0issues

MITlicense

2026since

Star historydaily snapshots by VibeCrowd

Collecting history — the radar snapshots this repo daily. The trend line appears after 3 days of data (2 so far).

Alternatives & relatedmatched by topic overlap

alirezarezvani/

claude-skills

▲ 422/wk

345 Claude Code skills & agent skills & plugins (30+ Agents, 70+ custom commands, 330+ skills, customizable references, scripts)for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and 8 more coding agents — engineering, marketing, product, compliance, C-level advisory, research, business operations, commercial & finance, and your daily productivity skills.

24k3.3kPython

VoltAgent/

awesome-agent-skills

▲ 426/wk

A curated collection of 1000+ agent skills from official dev teams and the community, compatible with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and more.

30k3.2k

OthmanAdi/

planning-with-files

▲ 158/wk

Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn re-injection against context rot, deterministic completion gate. Manus-style. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard.

26k2.2kShell

JimLiu/

baoyu-skills

25k2.7kTypeScriptgiant

NevaMind-AI/

memU

▲ 139/wk

Personal memory across agents

14k1.1kPython

Egonex-AI/

Understand-Anything

Graphs that teach > graphs that impress. Turn any code into an interactive knowledge graph you can explore, search, and ask questions about. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, and more.

77k6.5kTypeScriptgiant

Compareoptim-plans vs claude-skills optim-plans vs awesome-agent-skills optim-plans vs planning-with-files

Agent skills inside · 12

All skills →

optim-plansMUST USE when a user asks to plan, brainstorm, design, scope, review, or evaluate a repo change before implementation; do not use for direct implementation-only requests, factual/explanation questions, trivial operations, or explicit no-plan requests.Code Review & Quality deep-research-planUse deep-research-plan for repo-change plans needing downloaded projects, articles, or papers, per-reference analysis, graphify JSON, and stronger-than-huge planning; exclude direct implementation-only, factual/explanation, trivial, or explicit no-plan requests.Workflow & Productivity review-and-planUse when the user asks Codex to review a repository for improvement opportunities, feature inspiration, roadmap ideas, or implementation candidates before planning changes; exclude direct implementation-only, factual/explanation, trivial, or explicit no-plan requests.Code Review & Quality analyze-and-planMUST USE when investigating a bug, CI failure, test failure, regression, incident, broken behavior, root cause, RCA, or debug-why problem before deciding whether to create an optim-plans solution plan; do not use for ordinary feature ideas, vague product planning, direct implementation-only requests, factual/explanation questions, trivial operations, or explicit no-plan requests.Testing & QA planUse plan for normal repo changes needing bounded decisions, refinement, and high-priority review before execution; exclude direct implementation-only, factual/explanation, trivial, or explicit no-plan requests.Code Review & Quality research-and-planAlias for search-and-plan when external research should inform a repo-change plan before implementation.Workflow & Productivity

SharePost on X LinkedIn